RSS

Category Archives: Anwar AL JUBURI WAL LIWATI

MALAYSIA: BERSIH 2.0 MASS DEMONSTRATIONS – FUNDING UNREST

Written and Photographed by Nile Bowie

Accounts of police brutality plague attendees of the 
Bersih 2.0 rally, riot police engaged the use 
of tear gas and chemical laden 
water cannons against demonstrators.
Scenes of chaos unfolded on the streets of downtown Kuala Lumpur this past weekend, culminating in an event, which many have called the most defining moment in recent Malaysian history. Thousands of people, many well intentioned first time demonstrators gathered to voice their discontent about the Malaysian electoral system under the umbrella of Bersih 2.0, calling itself ‘The Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections’, which is comprised of a ‘coalition of like minded civil society organizations unaffiliated to any political party’. Amidst this climate of seeming neutrality, the ruling Malaysian political party Barisan Nasional declared the gathering illegal and has made stark allegations regarding group’s true intentions, accusing the movement to be a vehicle utilizing mass fervor to strengthen foreign funded political parties associated with opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim, the former Malaysian Deputy Prime Minster and former Chairman of the Development Committee of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund.  Bersih 2.0chairperson Ambiga Sreenevasan has admitted to Malaysian Press that two US-based organizations, the National Democratic Institute (which receives funding from the USNational Endowment for Democracy) and George Soros’s Open Society Institute have donated an undisclosed amount of money to the organisation; these think tanks and Intelligence front groups based in the United States are synonymous for authoring US Foreign Policy and shaping world opinion towards foreign leaders as they actively fund various oppositions movements through color revolutions, which lead to the installation of leaders of whom are friendly to objectives of the Anglo-American establishment and profiteers of Corporate high finance.
 
The Bersih 2.0 rallies succeeded in briefly unifying 
Malaysia’s various ethnic groups 
amidst a history of racial tension.
Malaysia is multicultural society with a history of race related tensionsbetween the predominantly Islamic Malay ethnicity of whom tend to control political bureaucracy through preferential treatment of members within their racial group and ethnically Chinese Malaysians, descendants of settlers and economic migrants seeking employment in Colonial British rubber plantations of whom today dominate the business and commercial sectors and hold the highest national income. Regardless of Bersih 2.0’s objectives or its utilization from Opposition leaders, the mass gathering succeeded in creating a patriotic and carnival-like atmosphere of unity between its participants of all ethnicities, as they behaved nonviolently and in uniformal stride for greater representation prior to riot police distinguishing any chance of dialogue by dispersing the gathering with waves of tear gas and chemical-laden water cannons, amidst numerous cases of heavy handed police brutality and arbitrary arrests, to the extent of launching tear gas canisters into the compound of a nearby hospital where demonstrators sought cover. Initially, many Malaysians may naively welcome support from American Institutions, which market themselves on keen selling points such as ‘instilling democracy and funding freedom’, this funding is not intended to alleviate corruption or to justly persecute police brutality, it is intended to increase Washington’s presence in countries integrated in China’s economic orbit and the eventual installation of a compliant Opposition leader, friendly to the bidding of International Financial regulatory bodies and planners of the New Financial World Order.
 
Amnesty International has urged the United States Government not to be a spectator while Malaysian authorities defy human rights by dispersing its demonstrations, it’s director adding “If the U.S. government does not take strong approach to human rights inMalaysia, it will seriously affect the United States credibility andeffectiveness on human rights in the region”. Dramatic coverage from Al-Jazeera prods the same wound amidst UN expertswarning the methods of crowd dispersal exercised by the Malaysian authorities actively undermine democracy. While it is distressing to see well-intentioned people from every age demographic gather in the pursuit of creating better order in their electoral system be subject to police brutality, their activism will be leveraged and totally exploited by media outlets and foreign Governments to undermine the credibility of the Malaysian Government, which obviously then provides a outlet for Western Governments to back their own opposition candidate. NGO’s urging the United States Government to enter the dialogue on human rights abuses is equivalent to using a searing branding iron to treat third degree burns; in fact such statements reflect total negligence for human rights by summoning a country currently involved in five wars in the Middle East and North Africa while enforcing heavilymilitarized domestic police protocol. While aggression cannot be denied on the part of Malaysian police who dispersed the event, it is curious that similar methods of crushing peaceful gatherings utilized in Europe, Israel and North America are met with a total media blackout, often using more elaborate forms of dispersal such as rubber bullets and sound frequency cannons on small gatherings dwarfed in comparison to the volumes of people present at the recent Bersih demonstration.
Bersih 2.0 Chairperson, Ambiga Sreenevasan has 
admitted to receiving funds from George 
Soros’s Open Society Institute, among 
other donors, which notoriously fund opposition
 movements’ intent on regime 
change in favor of US foreign policy.
Obviously the mainstream accounts make no omission regarding Internationalist billionaire George Soros’s direct donations to theBersih Organization, a man who has previously rustled feathers with leaders of theBarisan Nasional, such as former Malaysian Prime Minister Dr. Mahathir Bin Mohamad, a vocal critic against the official accountof the September 11thattacks, Israel’s treatment of Palestinians, and regulations of the financial institutions such as the IMF which utilize ‘gun to head’policies of national budget restructuring through lending conditions and structural adjustment programs. Mahathir has previously made accusations against George Soros for using his influence in the currency speculation market to contribute to engineering the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis as a punishment for allowing Myanmar to join the ASEAN Union. Malaysia’s central bank, Bank Negara reported a loss of approximately six billion USD when George Soros previously placed bets against it. Former Malaysian Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi appealed to Madeleine Albright, stating the Malaysian Ringgit and ASEAN currencies “continue to be bedeviled by currency fluctuations caused by hostile elements bent on such unholy actions. It is the height of international criminality that the fate of millions could be subject to the mercy of a few unscrupulous traders.” During the 1997 meeting of the International Monetary Fund in Hong Kong, Mahathir stated“Great countries tell us that we must accept being impoverished, because that is what international finance is all about. Obviously, we are not sophisticated enough to accept losing money so that the manipulators become richer. We are also warned that these are powerful people. If we make a noise or we act in any way to frustrate them, they would be annoyed. And when they are annoyed, they can destroy us altogether, they can reduce us to basket cases.”
 
Mahathir’s views on the negative effects of currency trading and speculation from 1997 are a breath of fresh air, especially in today’s climate where wars are fought over financial regulations, as seen in the recent attack on Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi amidst discussions of creating a Pan-African Dinar currency backed in gold. Former Indonesian President Suharto submitted his resignation while IMF riots swept his country, as the International Financial Regulatory bodies demanded the abolition of Government subsidies on staples such as rice and bread while cutting investment contribution towards State-run enterprises; chaos ensued in the streets as the Indonesian Rupiah suffered a debilitating 85% devaluation at the hands of International speculators. On the subject of the crisis in Indonesia, Mahathiroffered“Can it be that all the assets of that huge country, with 220 million hard-working people, are suddenly worth only one-sixth of its previous value? What, indeed, is the worth of a nation, if someone can devalue and even bankrupt it?” Mahathir attracted the envy of other emerging markets by creating exchange controls in defense of the Malaysian Ringgit, which safeguarded the currency, as it’s regional neighbors suffered IMF imposed austerity.
George Soros
George Soros is a hording Internationalist whose reputation clearly shows him to be no friend of the Malaysian people, the fact that Ambiga Sreenevasan has accepted funds from his Open Society Institute while claiming Bersih 2.0 to be “wholly funded by Malaysians” is simply not true and should raise more than an eyebrow. George Soros has been an integral figure in the funding of opposition movements in the Arab Spring, only to pave the way to governance for opposition leaders such as Mohamed ElBaradei and other trustees of think tanks and other likeminded US based outlets that would be happy to exploit their own people in a bid to grab power; in total covert imperialism, Soros has further contributed funding to organisations attempting to author a new Egyptian constitution. Soros’s influence over the mainstream media is astounding; Fox News reports over thirty major news organizations take his dirty money, surely this friendly contribution would not contribute bias to the programming content in anyway. BBC reports Soros vainly calling for regime change in Iran by insinuating an overthrown by means of the “bloodiest of revolutions”. Malaysians may not be happy with the current Prime Minister Najib Razak and the coalition of Barisan Nasional (which has practically ruled Malaysia since it’s independence), however it is unfortunate that populist opinion in countries of interest to Internationalists are utilized as a vehicle for undermining national sovereignty and eventual regime change.
 
In the Malaysian context, opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim would likely be the beneficiary of unrest created by Bersih 2.0, as the demonstrators will express their feelings of repression during the next Malaysian election. After the previous Bersih demonstration resulted in similar methods of dispersion, Anwar’s opposition Pakatan Rakyat (People’s Alliance)party gained control of four state Governments. Concerning the Bersih demonstrations, Dr. Mahathir offered,  “Its objective is to tarnish the government’s name and the police, and with that the opposition parties will win. There will be some people very angry who will probably, because of the current arrests and action taken, be disenchanted with the Barisan Nasional.” Curiously enough, Anwar Ibrahim served as Deputy Prime Minster from 1993 to 1998 under the administration of Dr. Mahathir Bin Mohamad; the pair initially disagreed on the utilization of recovery methods during the 1997 Asian Economic Crisis. During a 1997 meeting of the Malaysian Cabinet, Ibrahim conceived something of aneconomic coup by approving IMF austerity measures without consent of then Prime Minister and vocal critic, Mahathir. Anwar favored an economic view open to speculators and defended George Soros as he threatened to ‘destroy the country’ and remove Mahathir from power. During a visit to Malaysia, Al Gore referred to the mobs of people in the streets led by Anwar shouting “Reformasi!” as the “brave people of Malaysia”; the reforms Al Gore had in mind were strict IMF conditionalities which would cause strict foreign control over the Malaysian economy, of which Mahathir had spoken and guarded so eloquently against.
Ibrahim at the Pentagon with
US Secretary of Defense,
William S. Cohen
Anwar Ibrahim issued a statement in Asian Wall Street Journal suggesting that developing countries should stop “pointing a finger at speculators and put their houses in order first” by ending their “ambitious plans for outlandish projects.” Perhaps, Anwar views the symbol of Malaysia’s economic prosperity, the twin Petronas Towers as “outlandish”.  The tension between the two grew as Mahathir claimed“Prospective colonialists and their puppets in Malaysia are still trying to weaken this country” and that Anwar “used foreigners and the foreign media to support the actions of his supporters in order to topple the government of our country, his country.” After his years as Deputy Prime Minister, Ibrahim’s close friend, Paul Wolfowitz hired him as a consultant to the World Bank, amidst stints with George Soros-funded International Crisis Group and Dick Cheney’s Foundation For the Future, essentially an engine of South East Asian regime change. While Dr. Mahathir Bin Mohamad may not have led a mistake-proof administration, his assertions on how to handle the 1997 Asian Economic Crisis were bold and his administration presided over an ultimately successful economic transformation of Malaysia, from an exporter of raw material to a manufacturer of steel and vehicles. Cases of police brutality against Anwar Ibrahim during his incarceration are regrettable; his politics are obviously a threat to Barisan Nasional as riot police targeted him during the Bersih 2.0demonstration by horizontally firing a tear gas canister in his direction, which struck Ibrahim’s body guard, collapsing his jaw.
Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim clearly
 targeted by authorities as riot police shot a
 tear gas canister in his direction, collapsing 
his bodyguard’s jaw. 
 In this climate of apparent foreign funding subversion, the ruling Government’s actions have played out poorly; they have succeeded in appearing to be authoritarian in the world of International media bias and their actions have contributed to many Malaysians feeling spiteful, repressed, neglected, and left viewing Barisan Nasional as a self-serving hollow body. Irrespective of Bersih’s self-publicized disassociation with any political party, surely the actions of the ruling Government spoke volumes to indirectly strengthen the opposition parties led by Anwar Ibrahim. The pursuit of clean and fair elections by means of using indelible ink, postal ballot reform, and maintenance of the electoral roll are totally coherent and rational goals that would help to reduce corruption within the electoral system and they are goals worth fighting for; however an investigation of funds Ambiga Sreenevasan claims to have received from George Soros and the National Democratic Institute is imperative.The Inspector General of Police recently announced an investigation of Bersih’s admitted foreign funding while commissioning the Malaysian central bank, Bank Negara to assist in tracing the international money trail. As Western-owned international media has leveraged the plight of the Bersih movement’s activists, it’s opposition leaders are surely bound to receive credibility as Ibrahim warns of further demonstrations materializing in the form of ‘Yellow Saturdays’; If the opposition politics of Anwar Ibrahim use Bersih as a vehicle for his parties’ ascendency then ultimately, the Malaysian people will lose.
Advertisements
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 2, 2011 in Anwar AL JUBURI WAL LIWATI

 

CILI KASI TARUK! ……TIK …TOK….TIK ….TOK…


TIK…TOK….tik.,..tok…..OH Azizah……tik tok….

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on May 13, 2011 in Anwar AL JUBURI WAL LIWATI

 

Gempar! Ronnie Liu Terus Digesa Letak Jawatan

PETALING JAYA: Pemimpin DAP, Ronnie Liu terus menerima tekanan agar meletak jawatan selaku Exco Kerajaan Negeri Selangor selepas menerima teguran keras berhubung isu kontroversi kepala surat.

Tekanan tersebut timbul daripada pemimpin-pemimpin DAP sendiri yang menyifatkan imej parti itu hanya dapat dipulihkan sekiranya Liu bertanggungjawab sepenuhnya terhadap isu penyalahgunaan surat sokongan bagi mendapatkan kontrak kerajaan negeri.

Penasihat seumur hidup DAP, Dr Chen Man Hin berkata, Liu yang bertanggungjawab dalam jawatankuasa kajian dan penyelidikan kerajaan negeri Selangor sepatutnya mengambil tindakan yang sewajarnya.

“Sebagai ketua jawatankuasa kerajaan negeri (kajian dan penyelidikan) beliau patut tahu jika terdapat sebarang kesalahan,” katanya sambil menambah imej parti itu tercalar hingga menimbulkan prasangka buruk dikalangan masyarakat terhadap jawatankuasa disiplinnya.

Jawatankuasa Disiplin mengeluarkan teguran keras kepada Liu berhubung pengurusan lemah portfolionya dan pemecatan ahli Majlis Perbandaran Klang (MPK), Tee Bon Hock berhubung penyalahgunaan kepala surat.

Sementara itu, Ahli Parlimen Jelutong, Jeff Ooi berkata, ‘kerja pemulihan’ terhadap kerosakan yang dilakukan harus datang dari Liu sendiri yang juga Ahli Parlimen Pandamaran.

“‘Saham’ kami jatuh merundum kerana isu ini. Liu perlu bertanggungjawab dan mengambil langkah sewajarnya untuk memulihkan semula keadaan.

“Jika kita mahu parti kelihatan bersih, kita perlu cakap serupa bikin,” kata Ooi yang juga Ketua Staf di Pejabat Pentadbiran Kerajaan Negeri Pulau Pinang.

Ooi berkata pandangan orang ramai menerusi dalam talian terlalu negatif berhubung isu ini.

“Ia penting kepada kami kerana pandangan secara dalam talian membantu membentuk perjalanan politik untuk DAP pada 2008,” katanya.

Dalam pada itu, Speaker Dewan Undangan Negeri Selangor, Teng Chang Kim berkata, tindakan sewajarnya yang perlu diambil oleh mana-mana pemimpin yang didakwa melakukan kesalahan adalah meletak jawatan.

“Anda tidak perlu menjadi tukang tilik untuk melihat bagaimana perkara berkenaan boleh menjejaskan parti,” kata Teng yang pertama kali menggesa Liu dan Tee meletak jawatan.

Bagaimanapun, Ketua Pemuda Sosialis DAP (DAPSY), Anthony Loke berkata, persoalan mengenai pemecatan Liu tidak timbul buat masa ini namun Liu perlu bangkit dari segi prestasi.

Sumber-sumber parti menyatakan masa depan Liu bergantung sama ada Setiausaha Agung DAP, Lim Guan Eng terus menyokongnya.

Namun Lim yang terus membisu berhubung isu itu dilihat memberi sokongan kepada Liu yang setia kepadanya selama ini.

Pilihan raya parti negeri itu turut ditangguhkan dari Oktober ke Disember bagi menyelesaikan perkara berkenaan.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 18, 2010 in Anwar AL JUBURI WAL LIWATI

 

RAKAMAN CCTV,DNA,KETERANGAN 112 SAKSI YANG ASAL DI TUNTUT OLEH PELIWAT!!!!

1julaiANWAR AL-JUBURI MEMINTA SEGALA DOKUMEN ASAL BERHUBUNG KES LIWATNYA DARI MAHKAMAH!!!

ANTARA DOKUMEN YANG DI MINTA OLEH PELIWAT INI ADALAH BUKTI RAKAMAN CCTV ASAL YANG TERDAPAT DI KONDO TEMPAT KEJADIAN LIWAT INI BERLAKU. DAN JUGA BUKTI DNA ASAL KES LIWAT INI.

ANTARA DOKUMEN INI SALAH SATU NYA MERUPAKAN SATU PERMINTAAN YANG TIDAK MASUK AKAL SAMA SEKALI. BELUM PERNAH MANA-MANA PIHAK YANG DITUDUH MEMINTA DOKUMEN KETERANGAN 112 ASAL DARI MAHKAMAH!!!

SUDAHLAH SEGALA BUKTI BERHUBUNG KES LIWAT INI DI MINTA OLEH ANWAR AL-JUBURI INI MALAH KETERANGAN 112 MILIK PENGADU DAN SAKSI-SAKSI DALAM KES LIWAT INI JUGA ANWAR MINTA DARI MAHKAMAH!!!

KETERANGAN PENGADU DAN SAKSI-SAKSI 112 ADALAH SULIT DAN IANYA TIDAK PATUT DI BERI KEPADA PIHAK TERTUDUH DALAM MANA-MANA KES SEKALIPUN. NAMUN ANWAR MEMINTANYA!!! KENAPA BEGITU BANYAK SEKALI PERMINTAAN ANWAR AL-JUBURI INI???

JIKA KETERANGAN 112 INI DI BERIKAN NESCAYA PARA SAKSI-SAKSI AKAN TERGUGAT KESELAMATAN NYAWA MEREKA!!! INI MERUPAKAN SUATU YANG SULIT DAN KETERANGAN YANG AMAT PENTING DALAM KES LIWAT INI.

PADA DASARNYA KETERANGAN 112 DARI PENGADU DAN SAKSI-SAKSI TIDAK HARUS DI BERI KEPADA ANWAR AL-JUBURI INI. IANYA SEELOKNYA DI BENTANGKAN DI MAHKAMAH PADA 1 JULAI NANTI.

APAKAH JAMINAN JIKA BUKTI YANG ASAL DI BERI IA TIDAK AKAN DIUBAH DAN DI ROSAKKAN OLEH PIHAK TERTUDUH???

DI SINI KENYATAAN YANG TELAH DI BERIKAN OLEH MANGSA LIWAT ANWAR AL-JUBURI DALAM BLOGG BELIAU SAIFUL BUKHARI:

1)Ketika perbicaraan di Mahkamah Sesyen, penetapan tarikh-tarikh perbicaraan mengambil kira dan memberi kelongaran kepada faktor bahawa beliau perlu hadir di Parlimen.

2) Beliau juga diberi jaminan bon peribadi dimana wang jaminan TIDAK perlu didepositkan

3) Paspot antarabangsa beliau tidak ditahan.

4) Perdana Menteri (pada ketika itu Tun Abdullah) sendiri telah memberi jaminan kepada beliau dan keluarga supaya perbicaraan ini dibicarakan dengan seadil-adilnya. Rujuk penghakiman ini

UNTUK MAKLUMAN SEK 377B TIDAK BOLEH DIIKAT JAMIN. NAMUN ATAS BUDI BICARA HAKIM IANYA BOLEH DIBERIKAN JAMINAN PADA TERTUDUH!!!

DALAM KES INI TERTUDUH IAITU ANWAR AL-JUBURI TELAH MENDAPAT JAMINAN DARI PIHAK MAHKAMAH!!! DAN JAMINAN TAMPA SATU SEN PUN YANG PERLU ANWAR AL-JUBURI INI BAYAR. ADAKAH ANWAR AL-JUBURI INI MASIH TIDAK MENDAPAT KEADILAN DARI MAHKAMAH???

MAHKAMAH TELAH BANYAK MEMBERIKAN KEADILAN BUAT ANWAR AL-JUBURI INI SEPANJANG PROSES KES LIWAT NYA INI. JIKA BUKAN ANWAR AL-JUBURI INI YANG DITUDUH NESCAYA TERTUDUH ITU TIDAK AKAN DAPAT SEPERTI APA YANG ANWAR AL-JUBURI PEROLEHI!!!

JIKA SEGALA BUKTI ASAL BERHUBUNG KES LIWAT INI ANWAR PEROLEHI KELAK IANYA AKAN DIPERTIKAIKAN OLEH ANWAR SENDIRI KERANA BUKTI YANG ASAL DAN SAHIH ITU TELAH TERCEMAR!!!

MANGSA LIWAT SAIFUL BUKHARI YANG SEHARUSNYA MENDAPAT KEADILAN DALAM KES LIWAT INI. MANGSA PERLU DI BERIKAN TAHAP KESELAMATAN YANG CUKUP BAGI MENGELAK SEBARANG PEKARA YANG TIDAK DIINGINI BERLAKU.PARA SAKSI-SAKSI DALAM KES INI JUGA PERLU DI KAWAL BAGI MENGELAKKAN ADA PIHAK YANG CUBA MENSABOTAJ KES LIWAT INI.

KES LIWAT INI MERUPAKAN SATU KES YANG BERFROFIL TINGGI, DAN PIHAK MAHKAMAH SEHARUSNYA MEMASTIKAN MANGSA LIWAT DALAM KES INI MENDAPAT PEMBELAAN YANG SECUKUPNYA.

22 JUNE INI HAKIM AKAN MENETAPKAN SAMA ADA PERMOHONAN ANWAR AL-JUBURI YANG TIDAK MASUK AKAL INI AKAN DITERIMA ATAU TIDAK.

DIHARAPKAN YANG ARIF TUAN HAKIM BIJAKSANA AKAN MEMBERIKAN KEADILAN YANG SAKSAMA KEPADA PIHAK TERTUDUH DAN MANGSA LIWAT INI.

KAMI TERIMA SEADANYA KEPUTUSAN DARI MAHKAMAH DENGAN HATI YANG TERBUKA. BUKAN SEPERTI PIHAK DI SEBELAH SANA YANG TIDAK HENTI-HENTI MEMPERLEKEHKAN DAN MEMPERTIKAIKAN KEPUTUSAN HAKIM.

YANG HAK PASTI BERDIRI
YANG BATHIL PASTI JATUH

 
1 Comment

Posted by on June 18, 2009 in Anwar AL JUBURI WAL LIWATI

 

Anwar bela Militan!

1. Lawatan TYT Lee Kuan Yew ke Malaysia.

Selama 8 hari di Malaysia, Lee Kuan Yew telah menemui hampir kesemua pemimpin parti politik di Malaysia dari kerajaan dan pembangkang. Namun Lee Kuan Yew tidak menemui AnWAR w/pun ada usaha dari PKR membuat temujanji dengan Lee Kuan Yew.

PKR bersungguh-sungguh mahu mempertemukan AnWAR dengan Lee Kuan Yew. Sivarasa telah menemui Lim Kit Siang mohon bantuan agar AnWAR dapat menemui lee Kuan Yew. Manakala Saifuddin Nasution telah menemui pegawai di Kedutaan Singapura cuba mengaturkan pertemuan AnWAR-Kuan Yew, tentunya atas arahan AnWAR.

Difahamkan, Lee Kuan Yew tidak mahu menemui AnWAR kerana Kuan Yew sejak sekian lama tidak pernah mengkagumi AnWAR. Ketika AnWAR di puncak kuasa, kunjungan AnWAR ke Singapura juga tidak mendapat layanan sewajarnya dari Kuan Yew. Khabarnya Kuan Yew enggan menemui AnWAR kerana beliau tahu AnWAR seorang bernafsu songsang serta tahu sikap opportunist AnWAR.

Sivarasa yang berang telah menuduh DAP sengaja tidak membantu AnWAR agar bertemu dengan Kuan Yew sedangkan Presiden PAS juga bertemu dengan Kuan Yew!

AnWAR menerangkan kepada penyokongnya bahawa beliau tidak menemui Kuan Yew seperti Tun Mahathir. Seperti biasa AnWAR control macho lagi. Hakikatnya AnWAR terhegeh-hegeh menghantar utusan mahu menemui Kuan Yew bagi membuktikan dirinya penting di kalangan penyokongnya, namun tidak dilayan Kuan Yew. Ini berbeda dengan Tun Mahathir yang tidak pernah meminta menemui Kuan Yew.

2. Pasukan Khas Persekutuan Malaysia (PKPM)

Pasukan ini ditubuhkan sejurus selepas AnWAR ditangkap 1998 dahulu. Antara perintis pertubuhan ini ialah Anuar Wahi, seorang ‘berpangkat’ Leftenan Kolonel dalam PKPM tahun 1998. Anuar Wahi adalah aktivis PKR semasa era reformasi dan berpangkalan di Wangsa Maju.

Anuar selalu kelihatan di Bukit Damansara serta merujuk apa jua tindakan PKPM kepada Dr. Wan Azizah. AnWAR juga sering menghantar nota dari penjara kepada pemimpin pertubuhan ini menyokong segala tindak tanduk mereka membenteras jenayah (kononnya).

Kemuncak sokongan AnWAR kepada pertubuhan ini ialah pelantikan Datuk Dr. Wan Ismail (bapa mertua AnWAR) sebagai penasihat kepada PKPM. Anuar Wahi juga mendakwa beliau adalah penasihat ketenteraan kepada Dr. Wan Azizah serta bertanggungjawab merekrut ahli-ahli PKR sebagai anggota kerahan PKPM (spt askar wataniah dlm ATM).

Sekumpulan pendokong PKR yang rasional bersemuka dengan Dr. Wan Azizah untuk mengesahkan perkara ini namun tidak pernah dilayan. Begitu juga yang terbaru, AnWAR tidak pernah menafikan penglibatan PKR dalam pertubuhan haram ini.

AnWAR menyatakan bahawa tidak perlu dihalang untuk berbuat kebaikan sedangkan pertubuhan haram ini mencanangkan penggunaan senjata api kepada anggotanya. Anggotanya dilatih mengangkat senjata untuk melawan kezaliman dan AnWAR menggambarkan kerajaan kini adalah ZALIM!

Saya percaya AnWAR tahu kewujudan pertubuhan haram ini serta mahu mengeksploit kewujudannya. Mudah membaca sokongan AnWAR terhadap pertubuhan ini. Ianya tidak lahir dari sokongan yang ikhlas membenteras kezaliman tetapi lahir dari dendam kesumat beliau yang mahu melihat negara huru-hara. Inilah belang sebenar AnWAR……

Di petik dari blog X-PKR

 
1 Comment

Posted by on June 16, 2009 in Anwar AL JUBURI WAL LIWATI

 

Tangan ‘ghaib’ (@ Jahat) Anwar

Oleh X-PKR

Sudah terang lagi bersuluh! Benar seperti yang telah diulas sebelum ini.

1. Pembangkang mengumumkan akan bertemu bagi membincangkan kemelut politik Perak hari ini. Mereka merancang mengeluarkan kenyataan bersama agar nampak mereka bersepakat dalam hal ini.

2. Muka hadapan HARAKAH hari ini terpampang kenyataan YB Mahfuz Omar menyifatkan ada `tangan ghaib’ di sebalik keputusan Mahkamah Rayuan menangguhkan pengesahan DS Nizar sebagai MB Perak.

3. 2 manusia erdogan Selangor yang telah disebutkan memang `panjang akal’. Seorang professional, seorang lagi punya kelulusan tinggi. Maka mereka gunakan rakan `pak turut’ yang gila glamour nak jadi `hero’ tanpa fikirkan implikasi undang-undang untuk keluarkan kenyataan.

4. tangan ghaib’ yang cuba mencampuri urusan mahkamah sebenarnya ialah AnWAR! Ramai yang tidak menyedari hal ini. Bagi pembangkang, majoriti hanya ghairah mengikut AnWAR tanpa mencari fakta yang sebenar! Sokong boleh, tapi harus terbuka minda mencari kebenaran hakiki! Jangan ikut membuta tuli sahaja.

5. Hakim Mahkamah Rayuan yang mengenepikan keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi dua hari lepas adalah kenalan rapat AnWAR. Datuk Ramly Ali pernah menjadi Pendaftar Syarikat di Pejabat Pendaftar Syarikat. Datuk Ramly dan seorang lagi bekas hakim, Datuk Zainon Ali cukup rapat dengan AnWAR.

6. Hubungan akrab mereka seperti keluarga. Selepas AnWAR ditangkap 1998, nama mereka berdua pernah dikait kerana punya hubungan akrab dengan AnWAR. Berlatar belakangkan pendidikan perundangan, mereka faham tugas pihak berkuasa dan memberikan kerjasama sepenuhnya. Datuk Ramly dan Datuk Zainon amat professional sekali.

7. AnWAR menjangka Datuk Ramly akan menyebelahi beliau dalam penghakiman Mahkamah Rayuan tapi jangkaannya meleset. Bertindak atas prinsip keadilan yang telus, Datuk Ramly Ali membuat keputusan tanpa menyebelahi mana-mana pihak. Keputusan yang beliau buat berpandukan prinsip ketelusan keadilan yang beliau praktikkan selama ini.

8. Seperti biasa, bila sesuatu tidak berpihak kepadanya, AnWAR mula menyerang. Kini dengan menggunakan pecacai pembangkang, AnWAR cuba `membunuh’ karektor Datuk Ramly dengan menyatakan itu dan ini tentang Datuk Ramly.

9. Pihak kerajaan harus membela Datuk Ramly. Bela lah beliau bukan kerana keputusannya berpihak kepada kerajaan, tetapi kerana beliau seorang yang berprinsip dan sentiasa menjunjung tinggi ketelusan keadilan di Malaysia. Jangan biar AnWAR membunuh jiwa rakyat Malaysia yang mahukan keadilan dengan tipu muslihatnya!

10. Tahun 1997, AnWAR pernah mengutus pegawainya menemui Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi di Wisma Denmark KL ketika itu, Datuk Mohd. Nor Ahmad bagi membantu kes beliau berkaitan buku 50 dalil. Bila hakim tersebut enggan berkompromi, beliau sempat `ditendang’ keluar oleh AnWAR ke Shah Alam.

11. AnwaR juga pernah memanggil bekas Ketua Hakim Negara, Tun Yusof Chin ke rumahnya beberap kali ketika kes buku 50 dalil masih masih belum selesai. Tiba-tiba hakim perbicaraan pula ditukarkan serta-merta. Prinsipnya, pada bila-bila masa atau apa keadaan sekalipun, cabang eksekutif tidak boleh memanggil cabang kehakiman di mana jua sekalipun!

12. Apakah ini bukan campurtangan namanya? Apakah bila AnWAR yang buat, maka ianya tidak, bila orang lain, ianya benar? AnWAR boleh saja terus berpura-pura menutup kejahatannya, namun penyokong harus berusaha mencari kebenaran! Bukan untuk mengaibkan tapi harus punya fakta tentang siapa yang kita sokong, kerana kita akan disoal kemudian hari nanti…….

sumber – x-pkr

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on June 9, 2009 in Anwar AL JUBURI WAL LIWATI